Cannot install both [package@versionB] from updates-archive and [package@versionA] from @System

Bluefin
1

On the latest version of aurora-dx, I am getting what looks like repo version conflict errors when trying to add the package: qt5-qtbase-devel. What can I do?

❯ rpm-ostree install qt5-qtbase-devel
Checking out tree 149dba9... done
Enabled rpm-md repositories: updates fedora copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:hikariknight:looking-glass-kvmfr updates-archive
Importing rpm-md... done
rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2024-10-09T01:26:01Z solvables: 28705
rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2024-04-14T18:51:11Z solvables: 74881
rpm-md repo 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:hikariknight:looking-glass-kvmfr' (cached); generated: 2024-08-21T09:46:29Z solvables: 5
rpm-md repo 'updates-archive' (cached); generated: 2024-10-09T02:17:46Z solvables: 46493
Resolving dependencies... done
error: Could not depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.15-1.fc40.i686 from updates requires libEGL-devel, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires libEGL-devel, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires libEGL-devel, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.13-1.fc40.i686 from fedora requires qt5-qtbase(x86-32) = 5.15.13-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.7-1.fc40.i686 from updates  does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - mesa-libEGL-devel-24.0.5-1.fc40.i686 from fedora  does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - qt5-qtbase-5.15.13-1.fc40.i686 from fedora  does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.13-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.13-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.13-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.13-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.14-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.14-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.14-6.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.14-6.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.7-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.7-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.0.5-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.0.6-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.0.6-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.0.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.0.7-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.0.7-3.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.0.7-3.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.2-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.2-7.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.2-7.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.4-3.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.4-3.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.5-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.5-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package mesa-libEGL-devel-24.1.6-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive requires mesa-libEGL(x86-64) = 24.1.6-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.13-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora and qt5-qtbase-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.13-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and qt5-qtbase-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.14-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and qt5-qtbase-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.14-6.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and qt5-qtbase-5.15.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.0.6-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.0.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.0.7-3.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.2-7.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.4-3.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.5-2.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.6-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both mesa-libEGL-24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates-archive and mesa-libEGL-1:24.1.7-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
2

Does this package have to be at a system-level? Would a Distrobox container work?

3

Yeah, it’s a ZScaler dependency.

4

I’ll explore using distrobox with a Fedora 40 image and just tarball what I need from there to make it work system-wide. Maybe I can remove all my layered -devel packages after that.

5

This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.